A cost leadership business strategy
“focuses on gaining advantages by reducing its economic costs below all of its
competitors” (Barney 159). In the apparel
industry, all competitors attempt to gain this advantage by outsourcing
manufacturing overseas (Soni). However,
as one of the higher priced brands in the industry, Lulu can’t compete on the cost
leadership platform in the traditional sense, simply because Lulu will most
likely never offer prices that are lower than Lucy, Adidas, Reebok, etc.
While Barney discusses the importance of both
market economies and diseconomies, Lulu employs a slightly different strategy –
leveraging a “relatively high inventory turnover ratio compared to rival firms…[implying]
that either the stock sells out really fast in its stores or the inventory
levels are kept low deliberately” (Soni).
Thus, while consumer costs may not be the lowest in comparison to
competitors, Lulu is finding ways to find cost advantages within its actual
strategy.
Works Cited:
Soni, P. (2014, December 15). Company Overview: An Investor's Key Guide to Lululemon Athletica. Retrieved March 7, 2015, from http://marketrealist.com/2014/12/lululemons-profit-margins-trumping-companys-peers/
Soni, P. (2014, December 15). Company Overview: An Investor's Key Guide to Lululemon Athletica. Retrieved March 7, 2015, from http://marketrealist.com/2014/12/lululemons-profit-margins-trumping-companys-peers/
No comments:
Post a Comment